Contributed by: UNLOCKED and THE NATIONAL COLLEGE ATTAINMENT NETWORK
At the core of any strong, district-level postsecondary access and success strategy are engaged leaders and an intentional grounding in data. Yet more than half of principals in the recent RAND study report having no access to data on their students’ postsecondary performance. With the increased attention on college enrollment and persistence due to the pandemic, there is a unique opportunity to engage school and district leaders around postsecondary data.
Accessing the data is only the first step. While it is helpful to know whether college enrollment went up or down for a cohort of students as a whole, it becomes even more actionable as you begin disaggregating data (by race/ethnicity, family income, ELL status, dual enrollment participation, etc.) to understand which students are in need of the most support. With this additional layer of data, schools can identify the highest-leverage opportunities for improvement. This analysis can be done within a district or school with a strong data team, or with outside support to conduct a more robust analysis. This outside support could be a university research partnership like the Chicago Consortium and Chicago Public Schools, consulting support from specialized firms who work with National Student Clearinghouse data regularly, or off the shelf solutions.
How does the strategy create more equitable access and opportunities?
Every school and district has a unique set of factors that contribute to their students’ postsecondary success or challenges. With student-level data in hand, schools and districts can break down their college enrollment, persistence, and completion data into segmented populations. For example, when reviewing college enrollment, a school might layer in measures for academic preparation (such as GPA) and socio-economic status. Through this layered analysis, a school might identify that their highest achieving, low-income students are not optimizing the state-grant program. They could then restructure their advising and communication supports for those students. In Michigan, Susan Dynarski used school records to identify low-income, college-ready students and inform them that they qualified for free tuition at the University of Michigan. The aid students received was the standard amount of aid for the school’s lower-income applicants, but students who received this communication were more than twice as likely to enroll at the university.